lab studies / fire in the hole 2
lab study, simulation-based

188 million spins on fire in the hole 2: the widest RTP version gap we have measured added up to 16 points to the bust rate

exp · 049 · 2026-06-27 · simulation-based

provider Nolimit CityRTP 96.07% (versions: 96.07*;94.08;92.07;87.05)volatility extreme
at 50c a spin
€32,500
biggest win
65,000x top win
~210
spins to the bonus
about 42 min at 5/min
€40
average bonus
when it hits (80x)
€0.48
avg back per spin
of your 50c
win hit frequency 22.2% (~1 in 4.5 spins)max win 65,000x = €32,500 (a feature event)
fire in the hole 2 ships on a four-step RTP ladder, 96.07%, 94.08%, 92.07% and 87.05%, a 9-point spread that is the widest in our library, and the casino picks which one you play. we simulated 187,768,304 spins (90,000 sessions per version) at the 96.07% default and the 87.05% floor. at $0.50 a spin against a $100 bankroll, 74.7% of sessions busted on the default and 84.7% on the floor. and at lower stakes the gap is brutal: at $0.20/$100 the bust rate jumped from 35.4% to 51.2%, a 15.7-point swing from nothing but the version setting. it is the single biggest version effect we have measured.

Run it yourself in the live simulator. All figures are simulation-based observations, not predictions. See our methodology.

what we measured

parametervalue
provider / engineNolimit City · xWays / xSplit, mining collapse, xBomb multipliers
configs simulated96.07% (provider default) · 87.05% (published floor of the ladder)
published rtp ladder96.07% / 94.08% / 92.07% / 87.05%, a verified 9.02pp spread
volatilityextreme (10/10)
stakes$0.20 / $0.50 / $1.00 per spin
bankrolls$50 / $100 / $200
sessions10,000 per stake/bankroll cell, 90,000 per version
spin cap2,000 spins per session
max win65,000x stake
bonus buyyes, 70x (96.1%), 200x (96.34%), 600x (96.33%); Lucky Draw 175x (96.12%)

model inputs worth flagging: the four-step RTP ladder and the bonus buy menu are sourced, and the bonus trigger frequency (1 in 211 base spins) is published, a stronger input than most. but Nolimit does not publish a base hit frequency for this game, so we used its sibling Fire in the Hole 3's value (~22%) as a documented sibling estimate; the bonus payout distribution and base-versus-feature split are model assumptions calibrated to the published RTP and the 65,000x cap. the cross-version comparison holds all of those constant, so it is robust; absolute bonus-value figures are estimates.

how long bankrolls survived

survival curves, share of sessions still alive vs spins played

the stake sets the clock. at the $100 bankroll the default-version median ran 711 spins at $0.50. fire in the hole 2 is an extreme-volatility game where both the base (via xBomb multipliers) and the bonus can detonate, but most sessions never see the detonation, and the bankroll grinds down between rare hits.

bust rates

bust-rate grid, share of sessions that busted before the spin cap

bust rates within the 2,000-spin cap, 96.07% default version, 95% confidence intervals:

$50 bankroll$100$200
$0.20/spin68.2% ±0.935.4% ±0.91.1% ±0.2
$0.50/spin88.8% ±0.674.7% ±0.947.8% ±1.0
$1.00/spin94.6% ±0.487.7% ±0.675.8% ±0.8

plain reading: hold the bankroll at $100 and move the stake from $0.20 to $0.50, and the bust rate doubles from 35.4% to 74.7%. the only safe cell is $0.20 against $200 (1.1%), 1,000 spins of cover on a 1-in-211 bonus trigger.

the bonus wait, and what it pays

at the published trigger rate of 1 in 211, our sessions averaged one bonus about every 211 spins. the payout side (model-based estimates): the average bonus paid 80x stake but the median was just 44x, and 55% of bonuses paid under 50x. the extreme tail, the 65,000x ceiling, drags the average far above the typical round. a $100 bankroll at $0.50 buys roughly enough spins to expect a couple of triggers; the sessions that busted are the ones whose bonuses came late or paid small.

what a finished session looks like

final bankroll by percentile

the final-bankroll distribution at $0.50/$100 has almost no middle. seven sessions in ten ended with under $0.50 of the original $100, busted, in effect, with the median finish near $0.47. then it leaps: the 90th percentile kept $318. extreme-volatility Nolimit sessions either die or, rarely, detonate; the steady middle outcome barely exists.

the rtp version lottery

this is the study's reason to exist, and fire in the hole 2 has the widest spread we have measured: a published ladder from 96.07% down to 87.05%, a 9.02-point gap. the casino chooses the rung, and the player never sees it. we ran the full grid at the default and the floor; same model, same inputs, only the RTP changed:

cell96.07% default87.05% floordelta
$0.20/$100 bust35.4% ±0.951.2% ±1.0+15.7pp
$0.50/$100 bust74.7% ±0.984.7% ±0.7+9.9pp
$0.50/$200 bust47.8% ±1.062.9% ±0.9+15.1pp
$1.00/$200 bust75.8% ±0.884.1% ±0.7+8.4pp

the floor version raised the bust rate by 8 to 16 points depending on the cell, by far the largest version effect in our library, because the spread is more than four times wider than a typical 2-point Pragmatic ladder. same game, same explosions, same mine. the only difference is the nine points of RTP the operator chose to run. the version is the one variable a player can actually pick, so play it where the published RTP is highest. our casino hub ranks operators by exactly that.

methodology note

we simulate models calibrated to published math, RTP, hit frequency, volatility profile, bonus behaviour, not the provider's game engine. results are sample-based observations from 187,768,304 simulated spins (180,000 sessions across two RTP versions), with 95% confidence intervals shown. the bonus trigger frequency (1 in 211) is published; the base hit frequency is not published and uses Fire in the Hole 3's value (~22%) as a documented sibling estimate; the bonus payout distribution and base-versus-feature split are modelled. casino-by-casino RTP figures are the published ladder, not statements about any operator's current configuration. model validation: fire-in-the-hole-2 v1, analytic calibration exact at 96.07% and 87.05%, 10M-spin checks within tolerance. slots are negative-expectation games; nothing here predicts outcomes or improves odds. corrections policy: methodology.html.

Where the max win actually comes from

base 58%
feature 38%

40% of this game's RTP is locked inside the bonus you rarely trigger; the base game on its own returns just 58%.

A normal spin in our simulation never returned more than ~6,981x (€3,490). The 65,000x top win is a feature event, it only came out of the bonus. (base-game ceiling: paytable-sourced)

Play the Fire in the Hole 2 demo, or stress-test it

Looking for the Fire in the Hole 2 demo or free play? A demo shows you a handful of spins. Our free simulator runs Fire in the Hole 2 across thousands of sessions and shows what actually happens to a bankroll over time: the bust rate, how long the money lasts, and the wait for the bonus. It is the demo with the math switched on.

stress-test Fire in the Hole 2 free

FAQ

Is there a Fire in the Hole 2 demo or free play?

Yes. You can play Fire in the Hole 2 in demo mode at most casinos, and you can stress-test it free in our simulator, which runs thousands of sessions and reports the bust rate and session length, the demo with the math switched on.

Related studies