lab study, simulation-based

116 million spins on dead or alive 2: 64% of $0.50/$100 sessions busted, and the famous 111,111x max needs 142 million spins to land once

exp · 045 · 2026-06-27 · simulation-based

last updated 2026-06-27

Run it yourself in the live simulator. All figures are simulation-based observations, not predictions. See our methodology.

what we measured

a note on versions, because it is unusual for us: dead or alive 2 ships at a single fixed 96.8% RTP. the famous six-step NetEnt RTP ladder (96.82 down to 90.07) belongs to the original Dead or Alive (2009), a different game; search results routinely confuse the two. CasinoWizard, which tracks per-casino RTP, lists no alternate version for dead or alive 2. so this study has no version-lottery section, there is, for once, only one version to play.

model inputs worth flagging: RTP (96.8%, four sources including NetEnt's own page), hit frequency (29.80%) and bonus trigger rate (1 in 195) are well-sourced; the bonus payout distribution is a model assumption (lognormal calibrated to the published 96.8% RTP and the 111,111x ceiling), so all bonus-value figures below are model-based estimates, not measurements. the base-game ceiling (2,500x, the five-scatter pay) is a reasoned estimate, not a published base-only max.

how long bankrolls survived

the stake sets the clock. at the $100 bankroll, the median session lasted the full 2,000-spin cap at $0.20, fell to 1,213 spins at $0.50, and to 390 spins at $1.00, under an hour and a half at five spins a minute. the cheap seats are a different game from the expensive ones: $0.20 against $200 did not bust a single one of 10,000 sessions, while $1.00 against $50 busted 92.0%.

bust rates

bust rates within the 2,000-spin cap, 95% confidence intervals:

plain reading: hold the bankroll at $100 and move the stake from $0.20 to $0.50, and the bust rate jumps from 15.4% to 64.2%, the single biggest lever in the grid. the only genuinely safe cell is $0.20 against $200, where 1,000 spins of cover meant nothing busted. dead streaks ran long, as a very-high-volatility game implies: at $0.50/$100 the 90th-percentile session's worst winless run was 22 spins, and the longest observed in 10,000 sessions was 40 spins in a row without a single returning spin.

the bonus wait, and what it pays

at the published trigger rate of 1 in 195, our simulated sessions averaged one free-spins round every ~195 spins, as expected. the payout side is where the texture is (model-based estimates, 500,056 simulated bonuses pooled): the average bonus paid 55x stake, but the median was 30x, half of all bonuses paid less than that. 35.7% paid under 20x and 67.8% paid under 50x. the top 1% paid 389x or more, and over 50 million spins the biggest single bonus our model produced was about 4,660x, still a factor of twenty-four below the 111,111x ceiling. that gap is the whole point: the headline number is real and reachable, but a typical bonus pays around 30x, and the jackpot is an event you should expect to never see.

a $50 bankroll at $1.00 a spin buys 50 spins of cover against a 1-in-195 trigger, most of those sessions (92.0% busted) never reached the feature at all.

what a finished session looks like

the final-bankroll distribution at $0.50/$100 has almost no middle. six sessions in ten ended with under $0.50 of the original $100, busted, in effect, with the median finish at about $0.47. then the distribution leaps: the 70th percentile kept $67.20, the 80th kept $163.22, and the 90th kept $280.27. dead or alive 2 sessions overwhelmingly either die or, rarely, detonate upward; the comfortable middle outcome barely exists.

methodology note

we simulate models calibrated to published math, RTP, hit frequency, volatility profile, bonus behaviour, not the provider's game engine. results are sample-based observations from 116,199,198 simulated spins (90,000 sessions), with 95% confidence intervals shown. the bonus payout distribution is a modelled assumption (lognormal calibrated to the published RTP and the 111,111x cap), so bonus-value figures are estimates, not measurements; the base-game ceiling (2,500x) is a reasoned estimate. model validation: dead-or-alive-2 v1, analytic calibration exact at 96.80%, a 10M-spin implementation check measured 96.901% ±0.281pp se (within tolerance). slots are negative-expectation games; nothing here predicts outcomes or improves odds. corrections policy: methodology.html.

Where the max win actually comes from

Play the Dead or Alive 2 demo, or stress-test it

Looking for the Dead or Alive 2 demo or free play? A demo shows you a handful of spins. Our free simulator runs Dead or Alive 2 across thousands of sessions and shows what actually happens to a bankroll over time: the bust rate, how long the money lasts, and the wait for the bonus. It is the demo with the math switched on.

stress-test Dead or Alive 2 free

The Dead or Alive 2 RTP version, confirmed

Every new study, as it publishes

No feed games: one Telegram digest with each study's headline numbers, the week it lands.

get the weekly digest on telegram

FAQ

Related studies

• Blood Suckers
• Divine Fortune
• Divine Fortune Gold
• the full RTP database, how often slots really pay, aggregated
• all 101 studies